Permanent hydrophilic modification of fluoropolymers

ABSTRACT

A permanent hydrophilic modification for fluoropolymers is provided where the film consists of a charged polyelectrolyte complex that is reoriented. A process for producing this modification is also provided.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a permanent hydrophilic modification forfluoropolymers and the process for producing this modification.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Due to excellent chemical and thermal stability properties offluoropolymers, they are used in many areas of technology. However, afluoropolymer having a hydrophobic surface has proven to be adisadvantage in certain applications such as liquid filtration. Purefluoropolymers cannot be used for separating disperse particles in waterbecause they cannot be wetted with water. In order to use them forseparating substances from aqueous media, a number of methods have beendeveloped to make the surface of the fluoropolymer wettable with water,thus making them hydrophilic.

Numerous proposals have been made for imparting a hydrophilic characterto a fluoropolymer surface. For example, fluoropolymer membranes havebeen wetted with aqueous alcohol or ketone solutions. The hydrophilicproperties for these membranes are maintained only in the wet state,thus a permanent hydrophilic property is not achieved. According to U.S.Pat. Nos. 4,525,374 and 4,839,296, the fluoropolymer membrane isimpregnated with a mixture of solvent and surfactant. According toEuropean Patent 175,322, a membrane is impregnated with a hydrophilicpropylene glycol monofatty acid ester. The disadvantage of these methodsof treatment is that the surfactant is washed out during the use of themembrane, especially at high temperatures. It is also known from U.S.Pat. Nos. 4,298,002, and 4,908,236 that a microporous fluoropolymermembrane can be impregnated with a hydrophilic monomer and thenpolymerized. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,113,912, 4,917,773, 4,618,533 and4,506,035 describe impregnation of the fluoropolymer membrane with ahydrophilic monomer. Following impregnation, graft polymerization,crosslinking, a plasma treatment or a treatment with high energyradiation is performed for the purpose of fixation. However, it has beenfound that these methods lead to an irregular finish of the membrane andto an irregular crosslinking. In addition there is also the danger thatthe pores of a fluoropolymer membrane can become blocked. In PolymerPreprints 31 (1990) 1, M. S. Shoichet/T. J. McCarthy, U.S. Pat. No.3,390,067 and European Patent 245,000, chemical pretreatment of thefluoropolymer surface with reducing reagents and then graftcopolymerization are described. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 26 (1990) 2637,E.-S. A. Hegazy, N. N. Taher, A. R. Ebaid and U.S. Pat. No. 4,734,112describe pretreatment of a fluoropolymer membrane with plasma, laser orby glow discharge. This is followed by a chemical reaction with ahydrophilic substance. These methods lead to a loss of mechanicalstability of the membrane and to a nonhomogeneous modification of thearea near the surface. European Patent Nos. 407,900 and 456,939 describemodification of a fluoropolymer membrane with a hydrophilic polymer andthen chemical reaction of the hydrophilic groups. This method has thedisadvantage that the membrane has a reduced solvent stability and thereis a loss of the hydrophilic character at elevated temperatures due toreorientation effects and thermal instability of the functional groups.According to European Patent No. 408,378 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,113,912, afluoropolymer membrane is rendered hydrophilic by treating it with ahydrophilic polymer and then completing this hydrophilic polymer with acomplexing agent. Although hydrophilic membranes produced in this wayhave a stabilized modification, binding of the hydrophilic components isinadequate and there is the danger of inactivation due to loss of thefinish. European Patent No. 436,720 describes the use ofpolyelectrolytes consisting of polycationic and polyanionic compoundsthat can impart hydrophilic properties to certain substrates. However,it has been found that these complexes yield completely inadequateadhesion to fluoropolymer membranes. Polyelectrolyte complexes are alsodisclosed in East German Patent Nos. 280,257 and 280,258 which caninduce a cationic modification of substrates. Here again, the adhesionis inadequate.

In summary, none of the references teach a permanent hydrophilicmodification for fluoropolymers that also provides for adequatehydrophilic properties, chemical resistance, mechanical strength, waterpermeability and permanence.

There is a need for a permanent hydrophilic modification forfluoropolymers, especially fluoropolymer membranes that have anincreased permanence and whereby at the same time the normally desirableproperties such as chemical resistance and mechanical strength of thefluoropolymers are maintained.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A permanent hydrophilic modification for fluoropolymers is provided andcomprises a fluoropolymer having a surface and a thin film of a chargedpolyelectrolyte complex that is formed on the surface of thefluoropolymer and reoriented. Thermal means may be used to reorient thepolyelectrolyte complex. The charged polyelectrolyte complex iscomprised of at least one layer of a polycation and/or a cationicallymodified synthetic resin and a polyanion and/or anionically modifiedhydrophilic synthetic resin. The hydrophilic synthetic resin may containone or more polyfunctional compounds. The fluoropolymer may bepolytetrafluoroethylene. A process for making this modification is alsoprovided.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a permanent hydrophilic modificationfor fluoropolymers and is characterized in that a thin film of a chargedpolyelectrolyte complex that is reoriented is formed on the surface ofthe fluoropolymer. This invention also provides for a process to producea permanent hydrophilic modification of fluoropolymers, whereby apolycation and/or polycationically modified synthetic resin is appliedto the surface of the fluoropolymer and a charged polyelectrolytecomplex is formed by adding a polyanion and/or anionically modifiedsynthetic resin and then is reoriented.

The advantages of the modification according to this invention includefirst the simple process for production. For example, only aqueous oraqueous-alcoholic starting solutions that are free of other organicsolvents are needed. These solutions also have good permeability,thermal stability and permanence and only small amounts are required foruse and they also yield good applications for a variety offluoropolymers with negative zeta potential. This process can be usedfor modification of a number of fluoropolymers having a negative zetapotential. Owing to the stability of the complex, detachment of thelayer is minimized. A monolayer of the complex yields an optimummodification because the application of the polyanion to the substratedoes not depend on the type or number of functional groups and thus theresulting zeta potential. For example, this means that even afluoropolymer membrane with extremely small pores can be renderedadequately hydrophilic without causing blockage of the pore structure.

The modification according to this invention consists of a polycationwhich in a low concentration covers the surface of the fluoropolymer,which usually has a negative zeta potential, and imparts a positive zetapotential to the substrate. The second component which is essentiallyresponsible for improving the hydrophilic properties is an anionicpolymer molecule, preferably a polyanion with aliphatic oraliphatic/aromatic side chains. The modification according to thisinvention has a structure such that a hydrophilic polycation and/or apolycationic functionalized synthetic resin is applied to the surface ofthe fluoropolymer and adsorptive forces (physical or electrostaticadsorption) are responsible for the bond between the substrate and thepolycation. The polyelectrolyte film has excess charges which impart apositive zeta potential to the treated polymer and are capable ofreacting with additional components. This reaction is used in the nextstep to form a complex with the dissolved polyanions or syntheticresins.

The fluoropolymers are preferably modified with components that foster ahigh degree of order of the hydrophilic groups on the surface and imparthydrophilic properties to the substrate. Controlled complexing incombination with later thermal fixation impart the desired permanence tothe modification and serve the purpose of reorienting the outermosthydrophilic component which has the excess charges. This component issuitable for developing a film with water molecules, for example, byforming hydrogen bridges or entering into interactions with other polarcomponents. Fixing the charge complex on the originally hydrophobicfluoropolymer serves the purpose of enrichment, fixation and binding ofother substrates to the surface. The type and number of ionic surfaceactive groups can be varied.

Through a choice of suitable structured polycations, a permanent changein the charge of the polymer surface is achieved and by means of areaction with polyanions or polyanion-active synthetic resins andsubsequent fixation, a stable state or order which has an excess chargebased on the existence of free ionic groups and which is responsible forthe permanent hydrophilic effects is achieved. Coordinative moleculeeffects promote the orientation effect.

Due to this type of coating, permanent modifications are achieved with aminimum amount of components.

Monolayers and limited multilayers are preferred. Depending on themodification varient selected, especially permanent hydrophilic effectscan be achieved.

It is advantageous in producing and using the modification according tothis invention for the substrate to be pretreated and to be free offinishing agents, soluble residues of the processing operation andimpurities.

It has also proven to be advantageous to use fluoropolymers that have amore negative zeta potential in comparison with pure fluoropolymers dueto the incorporation of functional end groups containing carboxyl groupssuch as those described in German Patent No. 4,117,281. This inventionis not limited to the use of a certain fluorocarbon polymer as thestarting material. Polytetrafluoroethylene, copolymers ofpolytetrafluoroethylene with perfluorovinyl ethers, hexafluoropropylene,monochlorotrifluoroethylene or ethylene, polyvinyl fluoride orpolyvinylidene fluoride can be used. In addition, compounds such asfilled (or impregnated) fluoropolymers may also be used. Fillers such asglass powder, glass fibers, silicates, graphite, pigments, metalpowders, etc., that impart a more negative zeta potential to themembrane, can be used.

As a result of the polycation modification, the polymer as well as thefiller undergoes a charge reversal at the surface in the first step.

This type of modification is especially advantageous for membranes whichare then treated to make them hydrophilic on both the inside and outsidesurfaces. Especially favorable fluoropolymer membranes includeuniaxially or biaxially drawn polytetrafluoroethylene membranes having apore size of 0.01 μm to 15 μm. These membranes have a symmetrical orasymmetrical structure of the pre size distribution and a porosity of40% to 95%. The membrances have an MVTR value (moisture vapor transportvalue) of 30,000 to 70,000 g/m² per day.

Development of the pore structure of the membrane is not limited to acertain technology. The pore-forming methods may include drawing,extraction of a second component, dissolving out one component, usingthe nuclear tracing technique and forming bubbles.

The water-soluble polycation must cover the entire surface of thesubstrate within the shortest possible period of time. In the case ofmembranes the internal pore surface must also be covered and the chargeof the substrate must be reversed (positive zeta potential) andsubsequently a positive excess charge of the substrate initiated,wherein a thermal fixation step may be preferred. This charged substratemust have a sufficient number of free and readily accessible reactivegroups that are capable of forming a stable complex with polyanions andsuitable synthetic resins. These functional compounds must be capable ofdeveloping a high state of order at the surface due to preorientationeffects in the molecule and during complexing and due to a subsequentfixation process and they must have an excess charge. This orientationcan also be achieved by applying the Langmuir-Blodgent technique tohydrophobic polymer surfaces. The result of modification of the polymeris a modified surface that is more hydrophilic and contains a greateramount of ionic groups in comparison with the starting polymer. Anexcess of polyanions must be used for this procedure in which case someof the anionic groups are capable of irreversible complexing with thecationically modified polymer but most of the anionic groups are neededto effect the hydrophilic properties.

Preferred modification with at least one monolayer of the complex can beobtained by:

(a) adsorbing the polycation on the substrate surface and complexing thelayer with synthetic resins containing at least one polyfunctionalcompound, preferably two polyfunctional compounds, whereby at least oneof the polyfunctional compounds contains ionic groups or diol groups andhas an excess charge after fixation; or

(b) most preferably adsorbing the polycation on the surface of thesubstrate and then complexing the layer with at least one polyanionhaving excess charges after fixation or;

(c) adsorbing a cationically modified hydrophilic synthetic resin on theinside and outside surface of the substrate and then complexing thelayer with at least one polyanion that still has excess charges afterfixation.

Preferred polycations include quaternized polyacrylamides,polyvinylpyrrolidones, polyvinylamines, polyallylamines,polyethyleneimines, polyvinylpyridine, NAFION® with quaternized endgroups, polydimethyl diallyammonium chloride and ionic synthetic andnatural polymers having quaternized end groups containing nitrogen.NAFION® is a perfluorinated membrane commercially available from E. I.DuPont de Nemours, Inc.

Preferred polyanions include polyethylenesulfonate,polystyrenesulfonate, NAFION® solution, a perfluorinated solutioncommercially available from E. I. DuPont de Nemours, Inc. of Wilmington,DE, and perfluorinated ionomers. They are used preferably in the form oftheir alkali salts.

Preferred complexes consist of polyallylamine polystyrenesulfonate,polyallylamine polyacrylic acid, polyvinylamine polystyrenesulfonate,polyvinylamine polyacrylic acid and polyethyleneimine polyacrylic acidand polyethyleneimine polystyrenesulfonate. The compounds that can beused in addition to the polycation include:

dispersions with the polyvinyl alcohol, acrylates, ethylene-methacrylatecopolymers, ethyl ene-methacryl ate-vinyl acetate copolymers

copolymers of maleic anhydride

polymers or copolymers of (meth)acrylic acid.

Polyfunctional compounds that can enter into chemical bonds with thepolycation include compounds that have multiple bonds capable ofaddition, epoxy groups, aldehyde groups, isocyanate groups and acidanhydride groups and acyl halide groups.

Water is the preferred solvent for the polyelectrolytes although othersolvents such as low molecular weight alcohols may also be used alone orin combination with water. Depending on the type of polyelectrolytesused (molecular weight, charge density, type of functional groups) andthe reaction conditions (temperature, pH, reaction time), an optimum endgroup activity and coverage of the surface can thus be achieved for eachsubstrate.

The reaction time varies between 10 seconds and 1 hour. The reactivityof the functional groups can be influenced on the basis of the pH. Anoptimum value for complexing is between a pH of 4 and 8. Afteradsorption of the polyelectrolyte onto the substrate--a sufficientperiod of time until development of a uniform layer on and in thesurface of the substrate must be assured--the process is repeated or ifthere is adequate coverage, excess polycation is removed by squeezing orby means of treatment with water. Complexing in turn takes place out ofan aqueous alcoholic solution whereby:

(a) polycations are applied, for example, from a 0.01 to 30% aqueoussolution. These solutions preferably contain 0.1 to 20% polycation.

(b) modified synthetic resins such as those of 0.1 to 50% aqueoussolutions or dispersions are used. These solutions preferably contain 5to 60 grams of synthetic resin per 1000 ml water.

(c) polyanions, for example, those applied from 0.01 to 30% aqueoussolutions. These solutions preferably contain 0.02 to 20% polyanion.

Modification of the complex is performed at temperatures in the range of10° to 80° C., especially in the range between 40° and 60° C. Thereaction can take place in one or two steps. A one-step reaction meansthat the polyelectrolyte or the cationic synthetic resin and thepolyanion are used in a bath. This is especially true in case (b), asspecified above, (i.e., when using a synthetic resin). A two-stepprocess is preferred. By means of a stepwise treatment of the substratein separate reaction solutions, uncontrolled complexing in solution isprevented and thus an optimum hydrophilic modification is achieved at alow starting concentration of the reaction solutions. Pretreatment ofthe polymer in an aqueous alcoholic polycation solution has proven to beadvantageous. After modification of the fluoropolymer, a fixationprocess is performed at temperatures between 110° and 180° C. Thefixation time depends on the substrate and must be adapted to the givenpolyelectrolyte system. It is preferable to work with periods between 5seconds and 15 minutes.

This invention is demonstrated below by way of examples. The followingparameters are used and described hereinbelow:

Zeta potential

To measure the zeta potential of the membranes an electrokineticmeasurement system EKA from the company PAAR was used. The analysis isperformed in first approximation according to the method ofFAIRBROTHER/MASTIN. This method relies on the formula:

    ξ=μ.sub.ρ.sup.* η.sup.* χβ.sup./ΔP*ε*ε o

wherein

ξ is the zeta potential

μ_(p) is the flow potential

ε_(o) is the Influence Constant

χ.sub.β is the specific electrical conductiveness of the measuringsolution.

ε is the relative dielectric constant of the liquid.

η is the dynamic viscosity of the liquid

Δp is the pressure difference between the oncoming flowside and theoutgoing flowside.

According to this method, for the majority of experiments and qualitycontrol measurements, in which the samples are always measured under thesame parameters, the only measurements necessary are those of the flowpotential and specific electrical conductiveness of the measuringsolution.

Liquid breakthrough pressure

The pressure necessary to drive water into the pore structure of thedried membrane was determined. To do so, the pressure of the test liquidwas increased slowly with a pressure gradient of 10 mbar/sec at thelower side of the membrane.

Contact angle

The contact angle (also known as wetting angle) of the membrane withrespect to a droplet of water at 17° C. was determined with a contactangle measurement device G1 from the company KRUSS.

EXAMPLE 1

A membrane of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) (GORE-TEX®membrane commercially available from W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.) (2μm pore size diameter, zeta potential according to the oncoming flowmethod -17 mV) was wetted with isopropanol and placed in a 0.1 Nsolution of polyallylamine (PAA). After 10 minutes at a temperature of60° C., the membrane was removed from this solution, excess PAA wasremoved with water and then the membrane was dried at 130° C. for 30minutes. The increase in weight of the membrane amounted to 1.5% and azeta potential of +20 mV was determined according to the oncoming flowmethod. This membrane was then placed in an aqueous alcoholic 10⁻¹ Nsolution of polyacrylic acid at 60° C., removed after 10 minutes,squeezed and heated for 10 minutes at 160 ° C. Results are shown inTable 1.

EXAMPLE 2

A membrane of expanded PTFE (2 μm pore diameter) (GORE-TEX® membrane)was wetted with isopropanol and placed in a 0.1 N solution ofpolyallylamine (PAA). After 10 minutes at a temperature of 60° C., themembrane was removed from this solution, excess PAA was removed withwater and the membrane was dried for 30 minutes at 130° C. The weightgain by the membrane amounted to 1.5% and a zeta potential of +2-0.1 mVwas determined according to the oncoming flow method.

This membrane was then placed in an aqueous alcoholic 5×10⁻³ N solutionof the sodium salt of polystyrenesulfonic acid at 60° C. Results areshown in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 3

A membrane of expanded PTFE (GORE-TEX® membrane) (pore diameter 2 μm)was wetted with isopropanol and placed in a 0.1 N solution ofpolyallylamine (PAA). After 10 minutes at a temperature of 60° C., themembrane was removed from this solution, excess PAA was removed withwater and the membrane was dried for 30 minutes at 130° C. The weightgain by the membrane amounted to 1.3%. This membrane was then placed inan aqueous alcoholic 1% solution of NAFION® solution, a perfluorinatedsolution available from E. I. Dupont de Nemours, Inc. at 60° C., removedafter 10 minutes, squeezed and heated for 10 minutes at 160° C. Resultsare shown in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 4

A membrane of expanded PTFE (GORE-TEX® membrane) (2 μm pore diameter)was wetted with isopropanol and placed in a 0.1 N solution of PolyminG100 (PEI). After 10 minutes at a temperature of 60° C., the membranewas removed from this solution, any excess polymine was removed withwater and the membrane was then dried for at 130° C. for 30 minutes. Theweight gain by the membrane amounted to 1%. This membrane was thenplaced in an aqueous alcoholic 0.1 N solution of polyacrylic acid at 60°C., removed after 10 minutes, squeezed and heated for 10 minutes at 160°C. Results are shown in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 5

A membrane of expanded PTFE (1 μm pore diameter) (GORE-TEX® membrane)with an increased carboxyl group content was pretreated in a solution of100 parts isopropanol and 50 parts of a 0.1 N PAA solution. Excess PAAwas removed by squeezing and the membrane was dried for 10 minutes at130° C. Next, the membrane was placed in a 0.1 N aqueous alcoholicpolystyrene sulfonate solution for 10 minutes at a temperature of 60° C.and heated for 10 minutes at 160° C. The weight gain by the membraneamounted to 3.4%. Results are shown in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 6

A membrane of expanded PTFE (2 μm pore diameter) (GORE-TEX® membrane)was pretreated with a solution of 100 parts isopropanol and 50 parts ofa 0.1 N PAA solution for 10 minutes at 60° C. and then placed in a 0.1 NPAA solution for 10 more minutes at 60° C. Any excess PAA was removed bysqueezing and the membrane was placed in a 0.5 N polyacrylic acidsolution for 10 minutes at 60° C. Next the membrane was tempered at 160°C. for 10 minutes. The weight gain by the membrane amounted to 7.5%.Results are shown in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 7

A membrane of expanded PTFE (pore diameter 2 μm) (GORE-TEX® membrane)was pretreated for 10 minutes at 60° C. in a solution of 100 partsisopropanol and 50 parts of a 0.1 N PAA solution and then was placed for10 minutes more in a 0.1 N PAA solution at 60° C. Any excess PAA wasremoved by squeezing, the membrane was dried for 10 minutes at 130° C.and then placed in a 0.1 N polystyrene sulfonate solution for 10 minutesat 60° C. Next the membrane was tempered for 10 minutes at 160° C. Theweight gain by the membrane amounted to 5.0%. Results are shown in Table1.

EXAMPLE 8

A membrane of expanded PTFE (GORE-TEX® membrane) with an increasedcarboxylic acid group content (pore diameter 1 μm) was pretreated for 10minutes at 60° C. in a solution of 100 parts isopropanol and 50 parts ofa 0.1 N PAA solution and then placed in a 0.1 N PAA solution for 10minutes more at 60° C. Excess PAA was removed by squeezing, and themembrane was placed in a 0.5 N polyacrylic acid solution for 10 minutesat 60° C. Next the membrane was tempered for 10 minutes at 160° C. Theincrease in weight of the membrane amounted to 6.5%. Results are shownin Table 1.

EXAMPLE 9

A membrane of expanded PTFE (GORE-TEX® membrane) (2 μm pore diameter)was pretreated with a solution of 100 parts isopropanol and 50 parts ofa 0.1 N polyethyleneimine solution for 10 minutes at 60° C. and thenplaced for 10 more minutes at 60° C. in a 0.1 N PEI solution. Excess PEIwas removed by squeezing and the membrane was placed in a 0.5 Npolyacrylic acid solution for 10 minutes at 60° C. Next the membrane washeated for 10 minutes at 160° C. The increase in weight of the membraneamounts to 6.2%. Results are shown in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 10

A membrane of expanded PTFE (GORE-TEX® membrane) with an increasedcarboxylic acid group content (pore diameter 1 μm) was pretreated for 10minutes at 60° C. in a solution of 100 parts isopropanol and 50 parts ofa 0.1 N PEI solution and then placed for 10 minutes more at 60° C. in a0.1 N PEI solution. Excess PEI was removed by squeezing, and themembrane was placed in a 0.5 N polyacrylic acid solution for 10 minutesat 60° C. Next the membrane was heated for 10 minutes at 160° C. Theincrease in weight of the membrane amounted to 6.4%. Results are shownin Table 1.

EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE Example A

A membrane of expanded PTFE (1 μm pore diameter) (GORE-TEX® membrane)was modified according to Example 1. Instead of the heating or temperingoperation, the membrane was dried for 30 minutes at 110° C. Thismodification could easily be washed off in water.

Example B

A membrane of expanded PTFE (2 μm pore diameter) (GORE-TEX® membrane)modified according to Example 5 was boiled in 200 ml water for 30minutes under reflux conditions. The weight loss amounted to <0.05%.

                                      TABLE 1                                     __________________________________________________________________________                    Inlet Pressure                                                                       Wetting angle                                                          of water in                                                                          with water in                                                                        MVTR in                                                                             Pore size                                 Name   Pretreatment                                                                           bar    degrees                                                                              g/m.sup.2 day                                                                       in μm                                  __________________________________________________________________________    GORE-TEX                                                                             No pretreatment                                                                        0.64   130    72000 2                                         (2 μm)                                                                            (control)                                                              GORE-TEX                                                                             No pretreatment                                                                        1.60   121    64000 1                                         (1 μm)                                                                            (control)                                                              Carboxylated                                                                         /        0.43   122    73000 2                                         Example 1                                                                            30 min 130C.sup.1                                                      Example 2                                                                            /        0.44   123    64000 2                                                30 min 130C.sup.1                                                      Example 3                                                                            /        0.50   126    48000 2                                                30 min 130C.sup.1                                                      Example 4                                                                            /        0.39   103    43000 2                                                30 min 130C.sup.1                                                      Example 5                                                                            yes.sup.2                                                                              0.79   107    57000 1                                                10 min 130C.sup.1                                                      Example 6                                                                            yes.sup.2                                                                              0.39    91    43000 2                                         Example 7                                                                            yes.sup.2                                                                              0.45    95    48000 2                                                10 min 130C.sup.1                                                      Example 8                                                                            yes.sup.2                                                                              1.20   101    38000 1                                         Example 9                                                                            yes.sup.2                                                                              0.28   107    47000 2                                         Example 10                                                                           yes.sup.2                                                                              1.11    62    47000 1                                         __________________________________________________________________________     .sup.1 Treatment and time of thermal fixation of the polycation component     .sup.2 Pretreatment in dilute aqueous alcoholic polycation solution      

We claim:
 1. A permanent hydrophilic modification for fluoropolymerscomprising a fluoropolymer having a surface and a thin film of a chargedpolyelectrolyte complex formed on the surface by a polycation adsorbedon the surface and complexed with at least one polyanion.
 2. A permanenthydrophilic modification for fluoropolymers according to claim 1 whereinthe polyelectrolyte complex is a polyallylamine-polystyrenesulfonatecomplex.
 3. A permanent hydrophilic modification for fluoropolymersaccording to claim 1 wherein the polyelectrolyte complex is apolyallylamine-polyacrylic acid complex.
 4. A permanent hydrophilicmodification for fluoropolymers according to claim 1 wherein thepolyelectrolyte complex is a polyvinylamine-polystyrenesulfonatecomplex.
 5. A permanent hydrophilic modification for fluoropolymersaccording to claim 1 wherein the polyelectrolyte complex is apolyvinylamine-polyacrylic acid complex.
 6. A permanent hydrophilicmodification for fluoropolymers according to claim 1 wherein thepolyelectrolyte complex is a polyethyleneimine-polyacrylic acid complex.7. A permanent hydrophilic modification for fluoropolymers according toclaim 1 wherein the polyelectrolyte complex is apolyethyleneimine-polystyrenesulfonate complex.
 8. A permanenthydrophilic modification for fluoropolymers comprising a fluoropolymerhaving a surface and a thin film of a charged polyelectrolyte complexformed on the surface by a cationically modified hydrophilic syntheticresin adsorbed on the surface and complexed with a polyanion.